Pretty Little Liars- Psychology Analaysis Paper - 1741 Words

Introduction Pretty Little Liars is a television show based on a set of novels that focuses on the lives of four teenage girls and the struggles that they face daily. After the murder of their cliques Queen Bee, Alison, each girl begins to get harassed and an anonymous bully threatens to expose all of their secrets. They are abused mentally after what seems like a never ending search to discover who the anonymous person that is harassing them is. The strong relationship that the girls maintain through their anxiety ridden high school career shows us that friendship can help to keep you strong. We will be looking specifically at Abnormal Behavior demonstrated throughout the girls high school days; Social identity theory demonstrated by†¦show more content†¦There are many scenes where Alison has different hair colors and looks, and at one point she even takes on another identity. Her alter ego was a girl named Vivian Darkbloom, and Alison made Vivian into everything that she wanted to be, but wasn’t. There is one scene were Alison is talking to Hannah and she says â€Å"Sometimes I like pretending that I’m somebody else, haven’t you ever tried it?† (King, 2010). When Alison says this to Hannah, she says it in a tone of voice that makes the audience believe that Alison believed it was normal to take the place of another. The social identity theory is a theory developed by Henry Tajfel, in which Tajfel believes that who we are socially determines how many positive feelings we have towards ourselves. Basically, if we like where we stand socially, then we will like who we are and display happiness. In this theory, Tajfel labels the â€Å"in group† and the â€Å"out group† and says that we will always compare our â€Å"in group† to another’s â€Å"out group.† By comparing these groups, we develop a better personal view on ourselves (King, 2009). A big factor of the social identity theory is that the groups will tend to critique the differences of the groups, and overlook the similarities. A modern day example of the social identity theory would be your everyday high school cheerleaders versus band members. The cheerleaders think of themselves as the queen bees of the school,

Essay about Argument Against Human Cloning - 1902 Words

In 1997, the first clone of a sheep named Dolly was created. This embryo had a success rate of one to four percent. When applied to humans, this percentage may decrease and become lower and more unpredictable. With lives at stake, is it worth the risk of the embryos involved in the unstable process? Although cloning may allow for new medical procedures and research of diseases and cures, it takes away from the natural biological order of life, and allows humans to play God while creating a margin of error which could result in many defects. Many ethical and moral dilemmas arise when discussing human cloning, and one can have many positions for and against each. To understand the issues surrounding human cloning, one must have a basic†¦show more content†¦In 1997, President Clinton proposed a moratorium on cloning that would not allow funding by the government. A bill was also presented in the Senate in 2001 that would legally ban cloning regardless of its funding, whether i t was federal or private. The repercussions of infringement on this law would be up to ten years in jail and a fine of up to $10 million (A). Human cloning proposes many arguments for each opposing side and can greatly impact the modern world based upon the research obtained through it. Whether or not that research is morally and ethically correct is the topic of most discussions in the genetics field. Beginning with the moral argument, one must understand reproductive freedom. Most cloning activists say that reproduction, or the lack there of, is a natural freedom given to people (C). Restricting human cloning would be a violation of that right. Just as people can choose not to reproduce using contraception, abortion, or abstinence, people should be allowed to use all means possible within their ability to reproduce, such as through cloning and in vitro fertilization (C). Cloning is the application of this right specifically (C). Another benefit of cloning is the ability to clone someone who has died to console those who are grieving over their lost loved one or to clone the DNA of a person that was known for his of her greatness. Scientists would be able to recreate these people in a new environment (C). A clones parent may have come fromShow MoreRelatedHuman Cloning : An Argument Against Human Reproductive Cloning2226 Words   |  9 PagesExplain in full the ‘life in the shadow’ argument against human reproductive cloning. How might the argument be objected to? Do you regard the argument to be morally decisive, in the sense that it establishes that human cloning for purely reproductive purposes must never be permitted? Explain and defend your answer. Introduction: As the advancement of time, the concept of human cloning can become a reality as with the breakthrough of biotechnology. Human cloning can be defined in terms of formationRead MoreShould Cloning Be Allowed?1440 Words   |  6 Pagesstory, human cloning is becoming a feasible practice. Recently there has been a successful cloning of a sheep, so scientists start to speculate the different uses of cloning human embryos. The three forms of cloning that stand out are reproductive cloning, therapeutic cloning, and cloning for scientific research. Cloning should be permitted, but only reproductive cloning should be permitted with a limit on the number of babies a person or family can reproduce. The arguments that support cloning dependRead MoreArguments Against Genetic Engineering673 Words   |  3 Pagesconsider one of the strongest arguments against genetic engineering was the statement given by the European Parliament in Cass R. Sunstein’s argument, The Constitution and the Clone. The following is an excerpt from the text book given by the European Parliament â€Å"The cloning of human beings†¦ cannot under any circumstance be justified or tolerated by any society, because it is serious violation of fundamental human rights and is contrary to the principle of equality of human beings as it permits a eugenicRead MoreThe Ethics of Cloning Essay1504 Words   |  7 PagesAccording to Richard Dawkins â€Å"Cloning may be good and it may be bad. Probably its a bit of both. The question must not be greeted with reflex hysteria but decided quietly, soberly and on its own merits. We need less emotion and more thought† (Dawkins, 2011). Cloning is a genera l term used to describe the replication of biological material (Cloning Fact Sheet, 2009). Throughout this paper the reasoning behind why cloning is an acceptable and potentially life changing science will be examinedRead MoreAn Argument against Cloning730 Words   |  3 Pages Against Cloning Introduction The recent past has seen successful research on cloning. Cloning is the asexual reproduction intended to produce an exact copy of an animal or human. In the case of human cloning, this is done by fusing the human DNA into a human egg causing it to divide and grow. This often results into the creation of a copy of an individual. For many years, human dignity has been upheld because human beings are divine beings with peculiar features and capabilities. The developmentRead More Human Cloning Should be Permitted Essay example1371 Words   |  6 PagesHuman Cloning Should be Permitted What would you say if I told you that scientists had just developed a new procedure that could lead not only to the cure for cancer, but would provide an unlimited source of organ donors and could lead to the first effective treatment of nerve damage? Now adding on to this scenario lets say that our government was taking action to ban this new procedure because of a few myths and some loud mouthed conservatives. This scenario is true and is taking placeRead MoreHuman Cloning And Its Ethical Issues1194 Words   |  5 Pageshave been many arguments in the world about human cloning and its ethical issues. In an issue there will always be pros and cons, but the question is, is this experiment right for humanity? This paper will give in detail about what is cloning, human cloning and how it is done. It will provide my point of view in this topic and two other different arguments from both sides of the issue and finally determine which ones are great arguments. I present my argument with we all are humans and deserveRead MoreThe Ethical Implications Of Science And Technology1147 Words   |  5 Pagesmight come next: human cloning. As reported in the article, â€Å"Clinton Bars Federal Funds for Human Cloning Research† by CNN, in 1997, President Clinton stopped all federal funding for cloning. â€Å"Clinton also called on privately funded researchers to voluntarily implement a temporary moratorium on human cloning research ‘until our bioethics advisory committee and our entire nation has had time to... debate the ethical implications’† (CNN). With scientific discoveries such as cloning many people relyRead MoreEthical Issues Related to the Cloning Debate1389 Words   |  6 PagesThe act of cloning a human being comes dangerously close to human beings acting as God. Do human beings have the right to tamper with nature in this way? This essay explores the various ethical issues related to the cloning debate, and seeks answers to this deep philosophical question at the heart of bioethics. As a student of genetic biology and future biologist, this question also has personal relevance. Our science is evolving at a rapid pace. As human cloning becomes increasingly possible, itRead MoreThe Ethics Of Human Cloning890 Words   |  4 Pages The ethics of cloning Early in 1997, Scottish scientist Dr. Ian Wilmot revealed to the world that he had successfully cloned an adult sheep, Dolly. With this invention, the world made a aggregate astonishment at the realization that cloning was no longer an aspect of a Science Fiction movie. Since then, human cloning has become one of the most expressing divergent topics in the world, discussions began regarding the ethic consequence of human cloning. In several recent opponents argue that

Harper Lee raises the issues of prejudice and injustice in To Kill a Mockingbird, but does little to solve them Essay Example For Students

Harper Lee raises the issues of prejudice and injustice in To Kill a Mockingbird, but does little to solve them Essay To kill a mockingbird is one of the most critically acclaimed novels of all time, set in 1932 Alabama. Harper Lee, the author, raises the issues of racism and injustice, though she offers little to solve these issues. To kill a mockingbird highlights a certain group of characters throughout the novel. This is the group of the mockingbirds, those that are on the receiving end of injustice and racism throughout the novel. Some of the mockingbirds are the main characters, Scout and Jem. Other mockingbirds are Tom Robinson, Atticus Finch, Calpurnia. The mockingbirds are the innocent characters, but that does not mean that the rest of the town are innocent. In fact, many are far from it. To kill a mockingbird carries the reader on an extraordinary odyssey through the fires of prejudice and injustice in 1932 Alabama. Scout, the narrator, is an embodiment of Harper Lees younger years. Through her eyes, we see a town split over an accusation, a lonely soul who the children are obsessed with, and one mans quest for vengeance. Scout Finch lives with her brother, Jem, and their widowed father, Atticus, in the sleepy Alabama town of Maycomb. Throughout the novel, these three characters become intertwined with many other members of the town, spinning together a web of adventure, prejudice, innocence, and vengeance. Throughout the novel Harper Lee, through Scout, recognises that racism is a huge problem in Maycomb, though not many answers are evident. One example of this is the plight of Dolphus Raymond. Dolphus, a wealthy white man who is in a relationship with a black woman, pretends to be a drunkard to avoid the shame that will be thrust upon him if the town is to realise his relationship is one out of choice. I try to give em a reason, you see. It helps folks if they can latch onto a reason. you see they could never, never understand that I live like I do because thats the way I want to live. This quote implies an important theme in the book. Dolphus is explaining to Jem that people search for reasons to persecute those who seem different to them. Dolphus thinks it is just as easy to give them something to talk about, than to try to deny it. Another element of the novel where it is clear that Harper Lee is, if the novel is any sign of her own views, was not sure as to a solution to racism and injustice at the time of writing. This is showed in the conversation between Atticus, Jem and Scout following the guilty verdict given to the Negro Tom Robinson, who is convicted on circumstantial evidence by an all white jury. Jem is at a loss as to how all twelve members of the jury found Tom guilty, and Atticus explains the system of how a jury is selected, and how that in the courtroom, meant to be a level playing field, a white mans word is always taken over a black mans word no matter the circumstance. Though Atticus raises the problem, he fails to find a solution and takes apart all of Jems arguments. This is the most blatant highlight of the fact that Harper Lee has not expressed solutions to the problems of Maycomb 1932. These are just two incidents in a novel rife with issues but scarce with answers. To kill a mockingbird offers a well written snapshot of 1932 Alabama, and highlights some of the problems that went hand in hand with this time. Though these problems are easily identified, they are not so easily solved, as shown by Harper Lees classic novel. .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 , .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 .postImageUrl , .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 , .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9:hover , .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9:visited , .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9:active { border:0!important; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9:active , .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9 .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u426d985b112ed52946a746a0707ff9c9:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Social status EssayIt was not for many years, even after it was written, that the problems raised in the novel were answered. If Harper Lee had solved those issues in her novel, it would have been an outstanding achievement, and have raised the novel to a whole other level, but, as it stands, To kill a mockingbird does not answer the racism and injustice issues raised in the novel.